<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software Associates. &#187; Verizon Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.software.co.il/tag/verizon-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.software.co.il</link>
	<description>Security and compliance specialists for medical device and healthcare companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A great year for data thieves</title>
		<link>http://www.software.co.il/2009/04/a-great-year-for-data-thieves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.software.co.il/2009/04/a-great-year-for-data-thieves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lieberman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI DSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.software.co.il/wordpress/?p=1206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Verizon Business Report on data breaches 2009 was released &#8211; the data breach investigations report headlines with 285 million data records breached in 2008: 91% of attackers were organized crime 74% of attacks by malicious outsiders 67% of vulnerabilities due to system defects 32% implicated business partners The report must be particularly disturbing to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Verizon Business Report on data breaches 2009 was released &#8211; the <a title="Data breach investigations" href="http://www.verizonbusiness.com/products/security/risk/databreach/" target="_blank">data breach investigations report</a> headlines with 285 million data records breached in 2008:</p>
<ul>
<li>91% of attackers were organized crime</li>
<li>74% of attacks by malicious outsiders</li>
<li>67% of vulnerabilities due to system defects</li>
<li>32% implicated business partners</li>
</ul>
<p>The report must be particularly disturbing to endpoint DLP vendors focused on preventing data loss by trusted insiders on  PCs (  99.6% of data was breached by  attackers attacking servers&#8230;. )</p>
<p>My experience with clients in the past 5 years in the data loss/extrusion prevention business has been focused on discovering internal security vulnerabilities and implementing cost-effective security countermeasures.  Our findings (summarized in our <a title="Business Threat Modeling" href="http://www.software.co.il/downloads/BusinessThreatModeling_4.0.pdf" target="_blank">Business Threat Modeling</a> white paper) were based on analyzing empirical data of 167 data loss events points a finger at <strong>software defects</strong> as a key data loss vulnerability. The Verizon business study appears to suggest that the situation has only gotten much worse &#8211; <strong>i.e. data breachs are rising as software quality is declining.</strong></p>
<p><!-- 	 	 --></p>
<p>A conservative estimate in our research showed that 49% of the events exploited software defects as shown in the below table. Theoretically we can mitigate half of the risk by removing software defects in existing applications. The question, which we  answer in the white paper is how.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="455" frame="hsides" rules="groups" bordercolor="#000000">
<col width="323"></col>
<col width="42"></col>
<col width="90"></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="455" height="17" valign="bottom" bgcolor="#800080">
<h5>Aggregated vulnerability distribution by 					type</h5>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td width="323" height="18" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Vulnerability 					type</strong></td>
<td width="42" bgcolor="#c0c0c0">
<p align="center"><strong>Total</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="90" bgcolor="#c0c0c0">
<p align="center"><strong>Percentage</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td width="323" height="18" bgcolor="#ffffff">Accidental disclosure by email</td>
<td width="42" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">5</p>
</td>
<td width="90" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">3.0%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td width="323" height="18" bgcolor="#ffffff">Human 					weakness of system users/operators</td>
<td width="42" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">13</p>
</td>
<td width="90" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">7.8%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td width="323" height="18" bgcolor="#ffffff">Unprotected computers / backup media</td>
<td width="42" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">67</p>
</td>
<td width="90" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">40.1%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td width="323" height="18" bgcolor="#ffffff"><strong>Malicious exploits of system defects</strong></td>
<td width="42" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center"><strong>82</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="90" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center"><strong>49.1%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td width="323" height="17" bgcolor="#ffffff">Grand Total</td>
<td width="42" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">167</p>
</td>
<td width="90" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">100.0%</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute (SEI) reports that 90 percent of <em>all</em> software vulnerabilities are due to well-known defect types (for example using a hard coded server password or writing temporary work files with world read privileges). All of the SANS Top 20 Internet Security vulnerabilities are the result of &#8220;poor coding, testing and sloppy software engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.software.co.il/2009/04/a-great-year-for-data-thieves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

