It is crucial to ask how we can adopt and execute a sustainable long-term strategy to combat and win the war against Islamic terror.
I’m an Israeli and we have seen a series of Israeli governments attempt to combat terror. In most cases, the strategy to combat Palestinian terror centers on worrying what the US and EU think of us. Not surprisingly, the focus on PR, image and relations with third parties rather than a root cause analysis of what the Palestinian terrorists really want has failed. In this post, I will explain why Israel is losing the war on terror, basing my analysis on empirical observations rather than political imagery and spin.
First of all where are we today? The so-called Oslo Peace process (and similarly-architected roadmaps of various sorts from the US or Saudi) are not only failures but significant contributors to continued violence; empirical evidence shows many more victims of terror violence after Oslo than before Oslo.
In late 2008, Yossi Beilin – one of the architects of the Oslo Accords, and one of the leaders of the left-wing Meretz party, has announced his resignation from public life. That says something – Oslo is universally declared by both Palestinians and Israelis (across the political spectrum) to be a colossal failure that resulted in loss of thousands of Jewish and Arab lives.
In the wake of the Barack Obama’s election to US President, and his team of policy advisors that came out of the Clinton and Carter administrations – it is time to examine the root causes of the failure of the international community to combat Palestinian terror. Max Abrahams writes in his article “What Terrorists Want”, that “the international community cannot expect to make terrism unprofitable and thus scarce without knowing the incentive structure of its practioners”.
The Carter administration brought us the fall of the Shah in Iran and the rise of Houmeini and now Ahmadinijad. The Clinton adminstration brought us 9/11.
Over the past 30 years, Israeli governments employed a variety of strategies to battle terror: a strict no concessions policy (during the 60s and 70s), promoting democracy (the Oslo agreement that created the PA and resulted in several elections for Palestinian self-determination) and land-for-peace appeasement (the disengagement from Gush Katif). None of the strategies have succeeded and if anything have resulted in more attacks on Israeli citizens, more Palestinian fatalities and economic hardship and higher costs for Israel with building of the security fence that carries a steep economic and domestic and international political cost.
The dominant assumption by Israeli governments (and prevailing model in academic terror studies) is that terrorists attack civilians in order to achieve their political objectivess. According to this model – terrorists act rationally to maximize their political benefit, choosing terror when the expected political gain less the estimated cost is greater than expected benefit of the alternatives.
However – Hamas and it’s competing terror organization Fatah both act irrationally – preferring continued violence to peace. More importantly – Israel and the West are acting irrationally in the war against Islamic terror, consistently taking steps that never work.
The reason for this is fairly simple – although the solution itself requires a very basic change in the way we behave.
Israel, Europe and the US consider this a political conflict with political solutions; in fact this is a religious conflict with military and religious solutions.
Islam values land and does not value human life. Islam’s strategic objective is to convert all non-Muslims to Islam by the sword.
Israel values life and is willing to compromise on land. Judaism’s strategic objective is to bring light to the world.
The religious part of the solution is for Jews all over the world and in Israel to execute their Jewish strategic objective – just as the Muslims as exercising their strategic objective: bring light to the world through personal example, strengthening personal belief in God, performing mitzvot and learning Torah.
The military part of the solution must be zero tolerance to Arab violence – one rocket fired against Israel – decimation of an entire city. I am sorry that it must be this way – but the path of fulfilling and living Jewish values with a strong hand against terror is the only way to win this religious war being waged by Islam.

See – http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/לא_תחנם
and http://www.tora.us.fm/tnk/sofrim/zuckm/31.html
There is a serious halachic debate on the mitzva of binyan haaretz and our relationship with non-Jews including Muslims (who are not considered עכ”ו)
but it is important to understand where we are today – which is why I wrote this article.
Danny Lieberman
I basically agree with you.
But since violence breeds violence,I think that your proposed
military solution requires a more measured cost/benefit strategy.
Gil
Hi Danny,
Maybe your father doesn’t agree with you, but I do.
I understand however that you are missing just one point. We must recognize WHY we are here and why we have the wright to fight. We must understand and make the world understand that this land, every inch of it, is ours.
Why? Nor because the UN, the Holocaust or whatever, just, plainly, because the Kadosh Baruj HU gave it to us!
The day we will all understand this and don’t be afraid of what the world may say about this crazy Jews who believe in their Gd, who believe he is our only friend, that day we may even get another step closer to Yamei HaMashiach.
May HaShem give us grace and let us see that day soon!!!
Daniel,
You are of course completely right. The land of Israel belongs to the Jews because Hashem gave it to the Avot. A friend told me walking home from Maariv last week – that our biggest problem is not we are not all working actively to build the Beit Hamikdash – we are so involved in our materialistic activities – that Hashem is treating us midah keneged midah . Food for thought.
Amen. Yasher Koach.
Danny Lieberman
I agree that you call it a religious issue and our governments fail to call it that – however, while your society has evolved and most of the arab world has had arrested-development it is still religion as the root of the problem. Until we all open our minds and grow and realize there is no magical god circling the earth telling us we are better then them we will always have this problem. Until the 3 current major monotheistic religions (actually all irrational belief systems) go the way of Zeus or Poseidon, we run the risk of blowing each other up in the name of mythology.
A good book to read: Sam Harris – The End of Faith
what happened to my last post – it appears to have disappeared – while i disagreed with part of your blog, i dont think i stated anything offensive… does not speak well to have a blog, remove posts that dont agree – sort of defeats the whole reason to blog — maybe a monolog is more fitting (completely turn off comments from others to be fair)
Patrick,
Apologize for my tardiness in approving your comments.
Not to worry – I was off visiting my brother-in-law in Beer Sheva and didn’t have time to approve your comments. While I was there – 5 missiles fell in the space of 30 minutes….
I appreciate your comments – that’s what a blog is for – isn’t it!
I think that the conflict between Islam and the West, Palestinians and Israelis is rooted in religion – I don’t think that the answer is to detach ourselves from religious belief. If anything – if the Jews and Muslims were to adhere strictly to their religious tenets then the Palestinians would not be blowing themselves up, killing over 1000 Israelis and the Jews would not be using strong military force to battle Palestinian terrorists. Jacob and Esau eventually reconciled, non-violently and Abraham and Ismael never had a violent conflict. Maimonides lived in Egypt under Islamic rule and enjoyed free speech. There is empirical evidence going back to Haj Amin El Husseini back in the 30s and 40s that the Palestinian cause in the 20th century was influenced by Nazi / Fascist elements – not religious elements.
Danny Lieberman
Danny, I don’t disagree with the last part of your post, however, without the religious dogma and the mythology of after-life, the conflict would be religated to a political conflict. As a political conflict, much fewer would have the stomach for the continued conflict and the belief in Martyrdom. Rationalism over dogma/ideology is the only cure. Its irrational to believe that a maker of the earth has given one set of DNA divine right over land or others (or a special book is, well, special). While I might even agree that the leaders of Hamas and similar ‘groups’ have a political perspective, their dogma pushes to the masses under them allows them to continue the cycle of violence and hate..
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities” Voltaire
Without the irrational belief of some god’s will, you will find much fewer people wanting to continue the violence. Until we address the religious problems there (and in the West) it will continue.
From my perspective, Hamas launches missles into Israel whenever it needs to rally its masses ‘nationalistically’. Thow a few missles, Israeli forces strike back angering the masses, Hamas comes out and proclaims the attrocities of the zionists and reminds the masses of their religious ideology, the masses (while hating how they live in ruins under Hamas control) hate Jews more and side with their ‘captors’ (Hamas). While this all sounds political, its the ideology of religion that allows it to play out this way time and time again. Remove the religion and the ‘promised land’ from the equation and I believe the masses would start to sicken of living in dirt while those around them prosper. I doubt they would vote a Hamas into power if it weren’t for the irrationality of religion.
Patrick,
Even though I am an observant Jew – I agree with many of your points.
Christianity and Islam: the folks that brought us the Crusades and world Jihad.
There are however, counterexamples to the claim that removing an irrational belief in a divine being mitigates the risk of violence and improves physical security.
For one – Judaism is a peaceful religion based on learning and honoring other people. Because of that – the Jews are traditionally the victims – not the agressors.
Second – a large number of atheists in Europe with no belief systems are fervent supporters of the Hamas and anti-semitism in the name of free speech. We have a few of those in Israel also – who think that the right of free speech overrides everything else including allegiance to their country.
However – I think that your assessment of Hamas motivation is mistaken. Hamas has a strategic objective to destroy Israel, which is a sub-objective of Islamic domination of non-Islams. Hamas launches missiles at Israel as part of a terror campaign, not as part of a campaign to improve the quality of life in Gaza. Since the Oslo accords there have been democratic elections in the Palestinian Authority – and in the last PA elections – Hamas won a majority against the competing Fatah terrorist organization which are self-proclaimed secularists.
Patrick – this is the Middle East. Nothing is simple. You can remove religion and you will still have terror.
Danny Lieberman
Hi Danny and Patrick,
I strongly disagree with the way Patrick qualifies religion and religious belief. I understand that you don’t really know much about Jewish religion. Judaism has a big difference with Islam or Christianity. Judaism is not a theoretical belief, it’s a way of living, it’s living as per the laws of Torah, having clear 2 important things:
1) Man has a duty in earth that is to know HaShem and recognize him.
2) Whatever you do, you pay a price for it, you are responsible for what you do.
Just compare that with the in vogue theory of “Don’t worry, be happy” and may be you see the difference.
Daniel
Daniel, Patrick –
Judaism as a religion is the antithesis of Islam and Christianity is supremely open to ideas, the needs of other people and organizations but as Daniel pointed out – with a very clear mission to learn the Torah, obey the mitzvot and be personally responsible for your actions.
To help drive home the openness point even – note the huge cultural differences between the Jewish and Arab world – Israel translates 10,000 books a year from foreign languages to Hebrew…. and the entire Islamic world translates 400 to Arabic.
Danny Lieberman
Hi Danny,
Now elections are over and you see Bibi in action, desperately looking for Kadima and Labor, saying and believing that it’s not important that the people voted right (remember Feiglin?) What do you say about people voting Likud instead of Ichud Leumi? Is Livni foreign minister and Barak defense minister what we want?
The answer is no! But, as I told you before the elections, Bibi is not reliable.
I stand by my position of voting for a large party. Israel needs a two party system not a multi-ring circus like we have today.
Notwithstanding Bibi’s personality faults (which are sometimes quite harsh) – don’t forget that the Likud is a large party with many many talented people. Until the system gets changed – you vote for the party not the man.
And Zipi Livni is reliable? Kadima is a low-quality cast of corrupt politicians whose only claim to fame is a woman leader who has caused incredible damage to this country’s foreign policy yet managed to walk away with a clean slate.
Danny Lieberman
Hi,
I do not consider myself an authority on middle east situation , albeit , I am quite a novice. With that pretext , I have to say that I take strong exception to your comment on Islam .. especially below two lines..
—————-
Islam values land and does not value human life. Islam’s strategic objective is to convert all non-Muslims to Islam by the sword.
Israel values life and is willing to compromise on land. Judaism’s strategic objective is to bring light to the world.
—————–
If you say Islam doesn’t value human life , probably you have never understood it at the first place. To set the tone right , I am an Indian Muslim living in perfect harmony with co-religionist of my country ..Sikhs , Hindus , Christian and pantheon of other nature worshipper sects..
You probably should see Islam in other parts of the world too and not take all your judgement based on Arab culture. Islam is more than that , it covers sufism , mysticism as well.
I consider judaism as a great religion with strong emphasis on moral values and sanctity of human lives and expect others to respect mine.
Comments are welcome at my email address.
Thanks
Anas
Anas,
Islam is a great religion with roots from Ismael, the brother of Abraham. Somewhere along the way, something want amiss.
I want to agree that outside the Arab world – Islam is not violent. I’m just not sure where – looking at non-Arab countries like Iran, UK, France, Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia – I’m just feeling the love and peace.
I think that the acid test for Islam to show itself as a peace-loving religion – is for the Muslim countries of the world to join together help and host their Palestinian brethren, and not incite them with inflammatory rhetoric, arm them and then send them off as terror proxies.
Even one country would do, if Pan-Muslim unity is too much.
The Egyptians (a Muslim country) have closed their borders with Gaza – perhaps the Egyptians can open their border and normalize their relationships with their Palestinian brothers and sisters?
Danny Lieberman